So I am heading off to Regina later this week, which of
course means that time is moving in SLOW MOTION until then. So I thought I would
write a blog! And everyone and their dog is asking me what happened to Canada
at the Olympics, so here is my 2 cents.
Every four years, the Olympics usually provide the ultimate
affirmation that Canada is Curling. From the sports inclusion in 1998 through
2014 in Sochi, Canada was all over it. We either medaled every time, and when
we didn’t, there was always an excuse or a silver medal for us to comfort
ourselves with. Sure Martin missed the draw against Trulsen, but we all know he
was the better team. Cheryl Bernard lost the final, but that was a helluva
game. Mike Harris lost the final, but only because he looked greener than a
Saskatchewan Brier fan. It was always ours to win or lose. We were the game
that other teams circled on the schedule. Canada was always in the mix.
But not this time.
Koe and Homan were never even close to dominant, and in fact
did not look like the best teams there. On the men’s side, Edin looked stronger,
and the gritty Americans looked tougher. Homan was never in it. They looked
tense and on edge, not playing anywhere near their usual level of robot-like efficiency.
They lost to Denmark in a game that looked beneath the level I would expect to
see in our Tuesday night ladder game.
So what happened?
First of all – let me preface this by saying that none of this
is meant to be judgmental. I think both of these teams are outstanding. They
had bad weeks. They lost. It happens.
I totally respect the level of stress and responsibility
that goes along with wearing the maple leaf at an Olympics. If I were in their
place. I would need to be wearing brown curling pants (definitely not the
whites the Americans wore #codebrown, #cleanuponsheet2)
But let the post-mortem begin.
So here are my reasons why we came away with no medals (excluding Mixed Doubles of course):
1) The rest of the world
has gotten better. Yes I know this is unoriginal, but it is true. I played
in a spiel in Toronto on Labour Day weekend this season, and saw many of the
teams that were at the Olympics. They were there with entourages of trainers
and coaches, videotaping every game for future discussion. They have physical trainers.
They have psychologists. And they are learning the same way I learned, by
taking some beatings against better teams. But here is the thing, after a while
you learn. You get better.
Many of these teams have been at this for years.
Edin, like IKEA, has been here so long you forget he’s Swedish. Sure they still
call sweeping like the Swedish Chef tossing a salad, but they have learned how
not to lose.
On the women’s side, this is not
even a recent phenomenon. Canada does not win the women’s world championship
very often. The Swedes, the Swiss, the Scots and the Asian teams have been
winning for a while now.
2) Our Process is SOOOOO draining:
I know a lot of ink will be spilled on the process to qualify teams for the
Olympics. The Roar of the Rings is definitely the hardest thing to win in
Curling (for sure tougher than the Olympics), and the process requires you to
go hard for at least 3 years. Then you become Team Canada, all of 8 weeks
before you leave to go to Asia to train and curl. I cannot imagine how much of a whirlwind their
lives must be.
I do not think the process is horribly flawed, I just think
the cycle needs to be shortened a bit. We could play the Roar of the Rings at
the end of the 2017 season (like in April-May). This way Team Canada would have
7-8 months to adopt to being Team Canada without the pressure. Then they could
take a breath and rest a bit, so that their batteries are fully charged heading
into the Olympics.
I think we just need to find a way to get our athletes to arrive
in a better mental state, less burnt out.
3) On the women’s side, I was a bit shocked to see the
entourage that seemed to be trying to get into Rachel’s head at the games. She
has been working with mental coach Kingsbury for many years, but then the team
was suddenly given Cheryl Bernard as a 5th, and Renee Sonenberg as a
coach. So Rachel won without these people, and all of a sudden they are on and
around the ice giving them advice? Really?
I am sure everyone meant well. I know everyone wants them to
win. But every wolfpack needs an Alpha dog, and it never looked like Rachel was
assuming this role. Renee would come out and give advice, and Rachel would listen.
I am not saying anyone else was trying to be the Alpha, but
Rachel clearly was off to a slow start. Her confidence was shaken. To me the
worst sign of a skip struggling with confidence was the fact that at midpoint
in their early games, they always had 18 minutes or less left on the clock. Too
much discussion! Too much self-doubt! You could feel it while watching.
Again, I am not judging. This is one of the toughest things
to do in curling. It’s easy to play well when you are playing well. But as any
skip can tell you, you are almost always a few misses away from going to that
dark place where your inner dialogue is questioning instead of reassuring;
where self-doubt rears its head; where you wonder about every call and
seek affirmation from teammates and coaches on every move. This is where your team and
coaches need to help you by stepping back. Our instinct is to try to help, but
offering opinion and advice to a skip who is lacking confidence is throwing gasoline on
the fire. You are making it worse.
Maybe I am full of shit on this one, but I don’t think I am.
Here is prediction: This will piss Rachel off more than
anyone will know. And she will come back way stronger for having gone through
this. Once you know that way back from the Dark Side, you become a lot tougher
to beat.
4) Koe was not that bad.
He had a few bad games during the round robin, but put himself in a great
position to get to the gold medal game. Then he ran into a red-hot American
side. Koe needed to be in that superhuman state that he was in when he last won
the Brier. He was merely mortal, which was not good enough.
About the US Team
winning Gold
The US team winning gold will be the single most important
thing to happen to competitive curling since the inclusion of the sports in the
Games.
They are a likeable bunch of guys, and will champion the
sport well. There will be a ridiculous influx into US curling clubs, and
with people comes money. There will be more money to run programs, to hire
coaches, and build more facilities. The US success will create a gold rush for
curlers and developers.
Every time I am in the US, I am amazed of the quality of the
sports facilities that exist at a High School level, let alone Colleges. The football and baseball
fields at local high schools are way nicer than most of the University fields
in Canada, and even some pro fields. Imagine if they decide to add curling to their curriculum. Imagine the steel and glass structures that will make you want to throw all day long. I think
I should invest in a granite quarry.
I was sitting around with my team talking about this and
made the following prediction: Within 2-3 years, the biggest cashspiels in the world
will now be in the US. This might be the Slam moving events south, or the WCT
taking on more importance, but either way a shift is coming. It will be awesome for the sport.
I agree that it seems unrealistic to have a team qualify for the Roar of the Rings, then peak again 8 weeks later at the Olympics. The knowledge that you're going to rep Team Canada could use a little time to sink in, change your work/life/curling balance to give your team the best chance at gold. I think qualifying a full year in advance makes the most sense - with the Roar being the same time of year as the olympics. Then the winning teams can recycle that peaking process the following year to bring home gold. Good luck in the Brier my friend!
ReplyDeleteThe slam exists because of the way the CCA handles curlers, Rachel had to be impacted by their input.
ReplyDeleteHaving the roar earlier to allow the winners time to adjust makes sense, hence the CCA probably won't change a thing.
The US will indeed be the next hotbed of major curling events, I would love to see a slam event in Las Vegas!
I totally agree with point #3 on Rachel Homan. The CCA should have stayed out of her way and not dictated who they can take as a fifth...She didn't need Renee telling her what to do...
ReplyDeleteGreat start beating saskatchewan. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteUgly performance against Epping. You looked lost and confused. And your attempts at humor as you were getting destroyed fell flat. I can think of at least 3 Quebec teams that would perform better.
ReplyDeleteHow does it feel to be criticised from an armchair? Its not as easy as it looks under those tv lights is it? Maybe youll think about that the next time you criticise or dump on fellow curlers in your blog.
Whoosh.
DeleteWhat blog post were you reading, guy?
Seems to me that Mike was offering constructive thoughts on the Oly qualifying process; I didn't see any dumping on anyone.
Save that garbage for the CZ forums where trolls belong.
Keep on keeping on, Mike!
You always knew there would be an adjustment period at the beginning of this event.
If laughing helps you guys stay loose, or focused, or grounded... hell, keep on laughing all the way to the playoffs. Be yourselves; that's what got you here and it's what will help you play your best!
Definitely relate to the lost and confused comment. I totally was.
DeleteI really try not to dump on any curlers as a general rule. Whe I have in the past I usually feel bad and apologize. I really was not trying to dump on Rachel - sorry if you took it that way.
I will say that while I might often be in an armchair - at least it is not an anonymous one!
I do not delete comments - unless they are spam - so keep reading!
Totally agree with this blog. We are enjoying watching you and your team at the Brier. Hope you are enjoying being there and relishing all of your Brier moments!
ReplyDeleteGreat last shot against NB.
ReplyDelete